Cosey v. Ross et al
ORDER adopting in their entirety 7 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing with prejudice Cosey's property claim for failure to state a claim; and dismissing without prejudice, defendants Brawn, Vaughn, Lacey, and Hawk, for failure to state a claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/2/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ARTHUR LEE COSEY
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00763 BSM
ROSS, et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. Plaintiff Arthur Cosey has filed
no objections. After carefully reviewing the proposed findings and recommendations, they
are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Cosey’s property claim is dismissed with
prejudice for failure to state a claim, and defendants Brawn, Vaughn, Lacey, and Hawk are
dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of February 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?