Stricklin v. Huffman
Filing
5
ORDER adopting 4 the recommended disposition; granting 3 plaintiff Joshua A. Strickin's motion to voluntarily dismiss his complaint; and denying as moot 1 Stricklin's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Any in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action will be considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/4/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JOSHUA A. STRICKLIN
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:16CV00778 BSM
SCOTT HUFFMAN
DEFENDANT
ORDER
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 4] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
reviewing the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff Joshua A. Stricklin’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his
complaint [Doc. No. 3] is granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(I). Stricklin’s motion for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. See Doc. No. 1. Finally, any in forma
pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action will be considered
frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of January 2017.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?