Lindsey v. Randall et al
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 8 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects. Lindsey's challenge to the validity of his parole revocation is dismissed without prejudice. Lindsey may proceed with his First A mendment claim against Randall and Huffman. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Randall and Huffman and the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, 2 complaint, 7 amended complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/20/2017. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CHARLES LINDSEY, ADC #131529
No. 4:16CV00783 JLH/JTR
JOHN RANDALL, Jail Administrator;
and SCOTT HUFFMAN, Lieutenant,
Faulkner County Detention Center
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is
approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Lindsey’s challenge to the validity of his parole revocation is dismissed without
Lindsey may proceed with his First Amendment claim against Randall and Huffman.
The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Randall and Huffman. The U.S.
Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, and this Order on them
without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. If either defendant is no longer a Faulkner
County employee, the individual responding to service must file a sealed statement providing the
unserved defendant’s last known private mailing address.
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal
from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 20th day of January, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?