Goff v. Rousey et al
ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 19 State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting 23 Carroll County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/27/2017. (cmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BELYNDA FAYE GOFF
NO: 4:16-CV-00807 SWW
ARCHIE L. ROUSEY, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
The State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED.
The Carroll County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be
taken in good faith.1
DATED this 27th day of September, 2017.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Carroll County defendants’ motion [doc.#45] to strike plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate’s
recommendation is denied.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?