Adams v. Williams et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting in their entirety the 11 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Norman Adams's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/30/2017. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
NORMAN ADAMS
ADC #136063
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00813 BSM

C. WILLIAMS, Lieutenant,
White County Detention Center, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 11] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their
entirety. Accordingly, plaintiff Norman Adams’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a
“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Furthermore, it is certified that an in
forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of May 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE