Pruitt v. Williams et al
ORDER adopting 11 the recommended disposition; and dismissing without prejudice 1 plaintiff Michael Anthony Pruitt's complaint, which constitutes a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/23/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MICHAEL ANTHONY PRUITT
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00814 BSM
C. WILLIAMS, Lieutenant,
White County Detention Center, et al.
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Joe J. Volpe [Doc. No.11] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
reviewing the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff Michael Anthony Pruitt’s complaint [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed
without prejudice, which constitutes a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in
forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?