Comer v. Faulkner County Detention Center

Filing 6

ORDER Adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Comer's 2 Complaint. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/18/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SHAUN COMER v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:16-cv-907 KGB FAULKNER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted to the Court by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 4). Plaintiff Shaun Comer has not filed an objection to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time to file an objection has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Consequently, the Court finds that Mr. Comer’s complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b)(1). The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Comer’s complaint (Dkt. No. 2). Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this the 18th day of August, 2017. ______________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?