Jones v. Murry et al
Filing
42
ORDER approving and adopting 41 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all respects; directing the Clerk of Court to amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of Defendant Randy Murray's name; granting 38 Defendants' Mo tion for Summary Judgment; dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Murray and Sutterfield; dismissing 2 Plaintiff's Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/13/2017. (cmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JESSE RANDOLPH JONES
v.
PLAINTIFF
4:17CV00021-BRW
RANDY MURRAY, Jail Administrator,
Van Buren County Detention Center; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all
respects.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket to reflect the correct
spelling of Defendant Randy Murray’s name. (Doc. No. 11 at 1.)
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 38) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Murray and Sutterfield are DISMISSED with
prejudice.
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED.
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order adopting the recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in
good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2017.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson ______________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?