King v. Stage et al

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 20 the recommended partial disposition; dismissing with prejudice King's claims against the Saline County Jail; allowing King to proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against Stage and Briann; directing the clerk to pr epare a summons for Stage and Briann; directing the USMS to serve the summons, amended complaint, second amended complaint and this order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/21/2017. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ISSAC L. KING v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:17-CV-0073 BSM PATRICK STAGE, Care Provider, Saline County Jail, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The recommended partial disposition [Doc. No. 20] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended partial disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, King’s claims against the Saline County Jail are dismissed with prejudice. King may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against Stage and Briann, and the clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Stage and Briann. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, amended complaint, second amended complaint, and this order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. If Stage or Briann are no longer Saline County employees, the individual responding to service must file a sealed statement providing the unserved defendants’ last known private mailing address. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?