Stacy v. Andrew et al

Filing 70

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 69 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part 55 motion for summary judgment; dismissing with prejudic e Stacy's official capacity claims; and dismissing with prejudice Stacy's individual capacity claims against defendants Rice, Ryals, Stewart, and Munyan. Stacy's individual capacity failure-to-protect claims against defendants Andrew and Bryant will be set for trial. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/29/2018. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION

MICHAEL ALAN STACY
v.

PLAINTIFF
No: 4:17-cv-00093 JM-PSH

GARY ANDREW, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as
this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 55) is granted in part and denied in

part.
2.

Stacy’s official capacity claims is dismissed with prejudice.

3.

Stacy’s individual capacity claims against defendants Rice, Ryals, Stewart, and

Munyan are dismissed with prejudice.
4.

Stacy’s individual capacity failure-to-protect claims against defendants Andrew

and Bryant will be set for trial.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2018.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE