Buehlhorn v. Faulkner County Detention Center et al

Filing 36

ORDER Adopting 35 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendants' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendants Huffman and Stewart are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/18/2018. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LYNN STOPNICK v. PLAINTIFF 4:17CV00193-JM FAULKNER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Defendants Huffman and Stewart are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 18th day of January, 2018. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?