Wyles v. Montgomery
Filing
8
ORDER Adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Joinder is denied. T his dismissal constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/5/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
BOBBY RAY WYLES, JR.,
ADC #149401
V.
PLAINTIFF
4:17CV00267-JM-JTK
SCOTT MONTGOMERY, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.
There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety.
Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff=s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice, for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for joinder, docket # 7, does not cure the defects contained in
Plaintiff’s complaint as outlined in the recommendation.
Accordingly, the motion is denied.
3.
This dismissal constitutes a Astrike@ within the meaning of the PLRA.
4.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment
dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2017.
______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?