Mahoney v. Hurd et al
ORDER approving and adopting 6 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Mr. Mahoney's claims without prejudice based on his failure to state a constitutional claim; counting this dismissal as a "strike" for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/29/2017. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00280 SWW/BD
HURD and LOPEZ
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful
consideration of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation
should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Mr. Mahoney’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to
state a constitutional claim. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g) and this Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal
would be frivolous and not taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 29th day of June, 2017.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?