Randle v. Arkansas, State of et al

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 17 Recommended Disposition in its entirety. Accordingly, Randle's substituted 16 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/19/2017. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
LEODIS RANDLE
v.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00291 BSM

STATE OF ARKANSAS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 17] submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray and plaintiff Leodis Randle’s objections [Doc. No. 18] have been
reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in
its entirety. Accordingly, Randle’s substituted complaint [Doc. No. 16] is dismissed without
prejudice. This dismissal constitutes a strike, and it is certified that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(3), (g).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September 2017.

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE