Randle v. Arkansas, State of et al
ORDER adopting 17 Recommended Disposition in its entirety. Accordingly, Randle's substituted 16 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/19/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00291 BSM
STATE OF ARKANSAS, et al.
The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 17] submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray and plaintiff Leodis Randle’s objections [Doc. No. 18] have been
reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in
its entirety. Accordingly, Randle’s substituted complaint [Doc. No. 16] is dismissed without
prejudice. This dismissal constitutes a strike, and it is certified that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. §
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?