Laymance v. Shourd et al
Filing
39
ORDER adopting 38 Partial Recommendation. 34 Motion to dismiss granted. Laymance's remaining claims against Sharon and John Van Compernolle are dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/10/2019. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JEREMY DEAN LAYMANCE
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:17-cv-303-DPM-JTR
v.
RICKY SHOURD, Sheriff, White County
Sheriff Office; PAUL HOFSTEAD, Deputy,
White County Sheriff Office; SHARON VAN
COMPERNOLLE, Great Grandparent of Child;
JOHN VAN COMPERNOLLE, Great Grandparent
of Child; CASEY WALKER, Agent, Department of
Human Services; WHITE COUNTY, ARKANSAS;
and ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Unopposed partial recommendation, Ng 38, adopted.
FED.
R. Crv.
P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes); see also Lawson v.
Simmons Sporting Goods, Inc., 2019 Ark. 84, 569 S.W.3d 865. Motion to
dismiss, Ng 34, granted. Laymance' s remaining claims against Sharon
and John Van Compernolle are dismissed without prejudice for lack of
personal jurisdiction.
So Ordered.
(I
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?