Martin v. Does

Filing 12

ORDER adopting 9 the recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice 2 Martin's complaint, for failure to state a claim, which constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and denying 8 Martin's motion for a jury trial. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/27/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JEFFREY KEITH MARTIN
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00324 BSM

DOES, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Patricia Harris [Doc. No. 9] and plaintiff Jeffrey Martin’s objections and exhibits [Doc. Nos.
10, 11] have been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, Martin’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice for the
failure to state a claim, which constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma
pauperis appeal would not be in good faith. Id. § 1915(a)(3). Martin’s motion for a jury trial
[Doc. No. 8] is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of July 2017.

_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1