Martin v. Does
ORDER adopting 9 the recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice 2 Martin's complaint, for failure to state a claim, which constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and denying 8 Martin's motion for a jury trial. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/27/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JEFFREY KEITH MARTIN
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00324 BSM
DOES, et al.
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Patricia Harris [Doc. No. 9] and plaintiff Jeffrey Martin’s objections and exhibits [Doc. Nos.
10, 11] have been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, Martin’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice for the
failure to state a claim, which constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma
pauperis appeal would not be in good faith. Id. § 1915(a)(3). Martin’s motion for a jury trial
[Doc. No. 8] is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of July 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?