Gatewood v. Stone et al

Filing 7

ORDER Adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff will proceed on his excessive force claim against Defendant Stone. All other claims and Defendants Spikes, Page, Ryles, Randall, Lasker, and Andrews are dismissed from this action without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/6/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ISAAC JMAAL GATEWOOD, ADC #166860 Plaintiff, v. STONE, Officer, FCSO; et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * No. 4:17CV00341-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff will proceed on his excessive force claim against Defendant Stone. 2. All other claims and Defendants Spikes, Page, Ryles, Randall, Lasker, and Andrews are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of June, 2017. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?