McAlphin v. Wade et al

Filing 19

ORDER approving and adopting the 16 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part 9 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; dismissing wit hout prejudice Plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive damages based on Defendants' quasi-judicial and sovereign immunities and denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in all other respects; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/14/2017. (mef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES McALPHIN, ADC #88328, Plaintiff, v. BRENDA WADE, Director, Arkansas Claims Commission; et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * No. 4:17CV00343-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: A. Plaintiff’s claims for compensatory and punitive damages are DISMISSED without prejudice based on Defendants’ quasi-judicial and sovereign immunities. B. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed with his claim for equitable relief. 1 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2017. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?