Ridley v. Holiday et al

Filing 7

ORDER approving and adopting the 4 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his excessive force claim against Defendant Cass; dismissing all other claims and Defendants Holiday, Harris, and Doe from this action without prejudice; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/29/2017. (mef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BRIAN RIDLEY, * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. DOC HOLIDAY, Sheriff, Pulaski County; et al., Defendants. No. 4:17CV00365-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff will proceed on his excessive force claim against Defendant Cass. 2. All other claims and Defendants Holiday, Harris, and Doe are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the Recommendations would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2017. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?