Birch et al v. RHD Jr Inc et al

Filing 50

ORDER directing counsel to file a notice or joint motion with the final proposed agreement and all supporting papers by 2/7/2019. Plaintiff's counsel may file their bill under seal or file a redacted version on the public docket. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/25/2019. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION PLAINTIFF DAVID BIRCH No. 4:17-cv-384-DPM v. RHD JR., INC., dfb/a Mayflower RV Sales & Service; ROBERT H. DUDLEY, JR.; and MARJORIE DUDLEY DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court stumbled in not directing its usual proposedsettlement drill in the last slice of this FLSA case. The Court must evaluate the settlement for reasonableness. Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). The settlement agreement filed under seal, NQ 49, also appears to be a draft. Plus, while the parties may certainly agree on what they may say about the deal, the agreement must be filed on the public docket. Delock v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc., No. 4:11-cv-520-DPM, NQ 70 at 3-4. If that step is a deal breaker, then the parties should notify the Court. In that event, the motion, NQ 44, the discovery dispute, NQ 45, and the case will be put back on track for decision. proposed agreement and Notice, or joint motion with the final all supporting papers, due by 7 February 2019. Plaintiff's counsel may file their bill under seal or file a redacted version on the public docket. So Ordered. V' D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?