Stokes et al v. RPM Commerical Inc et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Motion. Mr. and Mrs. Stokes have up to and including 3/23/2018 to respond to the RPM Defendants' motion. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/12/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
KENNETH AND MARY STOKES
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:17-cv-00425 KGB
RPM COMMERICAL INC.
d/b/a COLDWELL BANKER COMMERICAL RPM, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is plaintiffs Kenneth and Mary Stokes’ motion to extend deadline to
respond (Dkt. No. 25). By prior Order, this Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes’ motion to extend
the deadline to respond to separate defendants RPM Commercial, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker
Commercial, RPM, and Rector Phillips Morse, Inc. d/b/a RPM Group’s (collectively, “RPM
Defendants”) motion for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss for lack of standing (Dkt. No.
24). The Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes up to and including March 9, 2018, to respond (Id.).
In their present motion, Mr. and Mrs. Stokes submit that they are working through settlement
negotiations and are close to settling (Dkt. No. 25, ¶ 3).
They further assert that they have
conferred with opposing counsel and that opposing counsel has no objection to the extension (Id.,
¶ 5).
For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Dkt. No. 25). Mr. and Mrs. Stokes
have up to and including March 23, 2018, to respond to the RPM Defendants’ motion
So ordered this 12th day of March, 2018.
________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?