Stokes et al v. RPM Commerical Inc et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting 25 Motion. Mr. and Mrs. Stokes have up to and including 3/23/2018 to respond to the RPM Defendants' motion. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/12/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION KENNETH AND MARY STOKES v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:17-cv-00425 KGB RPM COMMERICAL INC. d/b/a COLDWELL BANKER COMMERICAL RPM, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is plaintiffs Kenneth and Mary Stokes’ motion to extend deadline to respond (Dkt. No. 25). By prior Order, this Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes’ motion to extend the deadline to respond to separate defendants RPM Commercial, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker Commercial, RPM, and Rector Phillips Morse, Inc. d/b/a RPM Group’s (collectively, “RPM Defendants”) motion for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss for lack of standing (Dkt. No. 24). The Court granted Mr. and Mrs. Stokes up to and including March 9, 2018, to respond (Id.). In their present motion, Mr. and Mrs. Stokes submit that they are working through settlement negotiations and are close to settling (Dkt. No. 25, ¶ 3). They further assert that they have conferred with opposing counsel and that opposing counsel has no objection to the extension (Id., ¶ 5). For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Dkt. No. 25). Mr. and Mrs. Stokes have up to and including March 23, 2018, to respond to the RPM Defendants’ motion So ordered this 12th day of March, 2018. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?