Porter v. Huffman et al
Filing
27
ORDER adopting 19 Partial Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Nicholas Porter's claims of overcrowding, access-to-the-courts, and retaliation; dismissing with prejudice Mr. Porter's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Faulkner County Detention Center; dismissing the Faulkner County Detention Center as a party to this action; and denying as moot 26 Mr. Porter's motion for status update. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/17/2019. (cmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
NICHOLAS RAY PORTER
ADC #157943
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:17-cv-00484 KGB-BD
SCOTT HUFFMAN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 19).
No objections to the Partial Recommended
Disposition have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court
adopts the Partial Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff Nicholas Porter’s claims of
overcrowding, access-to-the-courts, and retaliation.
Furthermore, the Court dismisses with
prejudice Mr. Porter’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Faulkner County Detention
Center. The Court also dismisses the Faulkner County Detention Center as a party to this action.
Mr. Porter’s motion for status update is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 26).
It is so ordered, this the 17th day of April, 2019.
_____________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?