Southeastern Emergency Physicians LLC v. Arkansas Health & Wellness Health Plan Inc
Filing
288
ORDER holding in abeyance 258 Defendants' motion to dismiss Celtic Insurance Company and Centene Corporation; denying 260 Plaintiff's motion for order directing defense counsel to withdraw statements; denying 265 Defendants' mot ion for a mistrial; taking under advisement 273 Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law; and denying 281 defendants' motion for order to admit three categories of relevant evidence. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/14/2020. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY
PHYSICIANS, LLC
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00492 BSM
CELTIC INSURANCE COMPANY
d/b/a ARKANSAS HEALTH &
WELLNESS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Defendants’ motion to dismiss Celtic Insurance Company and Centene Corporation
[Doc. No. 258] is held in abeyance.
Plaintiff’s motion for order directing defense counsel to withdraw statements [Doc.
No. 260] is denied.
Defendants’ motion for a mistrial [Doc. No. 265] is denied for the reasons stated from
the bench.
Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law [Doc. No. 273] is taken under
advisement for the reasons stated from the bench, except that judgment as a matter of law is
granted on the corporate veil-piercing issue. Delaware law applies because NovaSys Health,
Inc. is a Delaware corporation. See Container Life Cycle Mgmt. LLC v. Safety Mgmt. Servs.
Co., No. 6:20-CV-6001 , 2020 WL 2843224 at *4 (W.D. Ark. June 1, 2020) (Arkansas
Supreme Court likely to “apply the law of the state of incorporation” to veil-piercing claims).
Plaintiff offered no evidence that any defendant is “a sham entity designed to defraud
investors or creditors.” Doberstein v. GP Indus., Inc., CV 9995-VCP, 2015 WL 6606484,
at *4 (Del. Ch. Oct. 30, 2015). Accordingly, any veil piercing claims are dismissed.
After giving careful consideration to the arguments, defendants’ motion for order to
admit three categories of relevant evidence [Doc. No. 281] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2020.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?