Catar Clinic of Hot Springs LLC et al v. Robinson et al
Filing
35
ORDER: The Court hear argument, and took evidence, on possible injunctive relief at a hearing held on 8/31/2017 and 9/1/2017. The Court made three rulings: Subject matter jurisdiction exists; The 4 Motion for preliminary injunction is denied; and All defendants must preserve every record they have that relates to this dispute. The Court confirms that the agreed standstill order, 24 , has expired. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/7/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
CAT AR CLINIC OF HOT SPRINGS,
LLC, and STOCKTON MEDICAL
GROUP, LTD.
v.
PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:17-cv-520-DPM
THOMAS F. ROBINSON, M.D.; TIFFANY
TERRY; ARKANSAS RECOVERY CLINIC;
ARC REHABILITATION CENTER, P.A.;
CSCB REHABILITATION MANAGEMENT
GROUP, LLC; ADDICTION RECOVERY
CARE OF LITTLE ROCK; ARC CLINIC;
and JANE DOE #1
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court heard argument, and took evidence, on possible
injunctive relief at a hearing held on 31 August 2017 and 1 September
2017. For the reasons stated on the record at the end of the hearing, the
Court made three rulings:
• Subject matter jurisdiction exists;
• The motion for preliminary injunction, NQ 4, is denied; and
• All defendants must preserve every record they have that
relates to this dispute. This preservation obligation covers
all paper and all electronic records. It covers all related
records of all the named entities and all related personal
records possessed by Robinson, Terry, and the named
entities'
owners and operators.
During this case,
Defendants must keep up with their patient referrals, which
they can do by creating a stand-alone file, separate from any
patient file, for referrals.
This compilation will be a
confidential and protected record.
The Court confirms that the agreed standstill order, NQ 24, has expired.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?