Moles v. Shourd et al

Filing 16

ORDER adopting in its entirety 5 the partial recommended disposition; dismissing the following claims: 1) failure to follow detention center policy concerning incident reports, 2) failure to answer or investigate grievances, 3) plaintiff's cl aim against defendant Cox regarding medical treatment, 4) plaintiff's claim against defendant Williams regarding conditions of confinement, and 5) all claims for injunctive relief; dismissing Defendants Cox and Williams, without prejudice; and allowing Plaintiff Moles to proceed on all other claims. An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/2/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
WALTER CURTIS MOLES
ADC #119166
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00526 BSM

RICKY SHOURD,
Sheriff, White County; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe
J. Volpe has been reviewed. [Doc. No. 5]. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the partial recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly,
the following claims are dismissed: 1) failure to follow detention center policy concerning
incident reports, 2) failure to answer or investigate grievances, 3) plaintiff’s claim against
defendant Cox regarding medical treatment, 4) plaintiff’s claim against defendant Williams
regarding conditions of confinement, and 5) all claims for injunctive relief. Defendants Cox
and Williams are dismissed from this action without prejudice.
Plaintiff Moles is allowed to proceed on all other claims. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Section 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good
faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of October 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE