Parker v. Carpenter et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice 1 Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim; certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/27/2017. (cmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION FAHREN HAYDEN PARKER, * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. CARPENTAR, Lieutenant, Saline County Jail; et al. Defendants. No. 4:17CV00532-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations and the corresponding Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2017. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?