Story v. Arkansas, State of
ORDER adopting 3 Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice 1 Mr. Story's petition for writ of habeas corpus; denying 2 motion to stay; and denying as moot 4 motion to extend time. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/12/2018. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 4:17-cv-00541 KGB
STATE OF ARKANSAS
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“Recommendations”)
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 3). Petitioner Kendrick
Story filed a motion for extension of time to file objections to Judge Kearney’s Recommendations
(Dkt. No. 4). However, Mr. Story then filed timely objections to the Recommendations (Dkt. No.
5). Therefore, the Court denies as moot Mr. Story’s motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 4) and
considers timely his objections (Dkt. No. 5). After a review of the Recommendations and Mr.
Story’s objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the
Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 3). It is
therefore ordered that:
1. Mr. Story’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed
without prejudice (Dkt. No. 1);
2. Mr. Story’s motion to stay is denied (Dkt. No. 2); and
3. Mr. Story’s motion to extend time is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 4).
It is so ordered this 12th day of February, 2018.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?