Delph v. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences et al

Filing 6

ORDER: Delph's amended complaint adds some facts that show two plausible, albeit thin, claims. All her other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Delph must serve UAMS and Kirkwood pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and file returns of service pursuant to Local Rule 4.1. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/12/2017. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION

VERONICA DELPH
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 4:17-cv-542-DPM

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR
MEDICAL SCIENCES AND MELVIN
KIRKWOOD, Assistant Manager, UAMS

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
1.

Delph' s amended complaint adds some facts that show two

plausible, albeit thin, claims: disparate treatment based on race under
Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act; and retaliation for her first
EEOC charge under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. All
her other claims are dismissed without prejudice.
2.

Ordinarily the Court would order the Marshal to handle

service for a pro se litigant. But Delph has requested and received
summons and amended summons. So she must serve UAMS and
Kirkwood pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and file returns
of service pursuant to Local Rule 4.1.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge

-2-