Lawniczak v. Ryals et al
Filing
15
ORDER adopting in their entirety 9 the proposed findings and partial recommendation; dismissing without prejudice, Lawniczak's claims regarding jail conditions; and dismissing defendants Randall, Huffman, Andrews, and Page; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/28/2017. (kdr)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JASON LAWNICZAK
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00645 BSM
TIM RYALS, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed findings and partial recommendation [Doc. No. 9] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been reviewed. No objections have been
filed. After a careful review of the record, the proposed findings and partial recommendation
are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Lawniczak’s claims regarding jail conditions are
dismissed without prejudice; defendants Randall, Huffman, Andrews, and Page are
dismissed; and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of December 2017.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
