Coppock v. Ryals et al
ORDER rejecting 5 the proposed findings and recommendations. When Coppock's objections are viewed as a motion to amend his complaint, it is clear, based on Eighth Circuit precedent, that he has sufficiently alleged a remediable claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/28/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00662 BSM
TIM RYALS, et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 5], plaintiff Jason Coppock’s objections thereto [Doc.
Nos. 9, 10], and the entire the record have been reviewed, and the proposed findings and
recommendations are rejected. When Coppock’s objections are viewed as a motion to
amend his complaint, it is clear, based on Eighth Circuit precedent, that he has sufficiently
alleged a remediable claim. See Day v. Norris, 219 F. App’x 608, 610 (8th Cir. 2007).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?