Reyes v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al

Filing 132

JUDGMENT: Reyes's Eighth Amendment claim that Rohder failed to refer him to an optometrist is dismissed with prejudice. Reyes' s claims against Bland and Griswold are dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/24/2020. (jbh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
FROILAN REYES
ADC #155527
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 4:17-cv-762-DPM

DOES, Doctors at the Pulaski County Jail and
ADC; DAVID B. WARNER, MD, UAMS;
HARVEY L. BERANCE, Jones Eye Institute;
JOHNSON, Doctor, Pulaski County Detention
Center; ESTELLA BLAND, RN, Cummins Unit;
LaSONYA GRISWOLD, Cummins Unit;
MARCUS LAW, Doctor, ADC; and SHARYN
ROHDER, APN, North Central Unit

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
1. Reyes' s Eighth Amendment claim that Rohder failed to refer

him to an optometrist is dismissed with prejudice.
2. Reyes' s claims against Bland and Griswold are dismissed with

prejudice as time-barred.
3. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge