Tanner v. Ziegenhorn et al
Filing
152
ORDER granting 144 Motion for attorney's fees and costs. The Court awards Tanner $32,995.37 for attorney's fees, plus $990.94 in costs, for a total of $33,986.31. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/19/2022. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
JAMES ANDREW TANNER
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:17-cv-780-DPM
KURT ZIEGENHORN, in his individual
capacity, and BILL BRYANT, Colonel,
in his official capacity as head of the
Arkansas State Police
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Tanner's motion for attorney's fees and costs, Doc. 144, is granted
as specified and otherwise denied. He is entitled to $33.986.31 as a
reasonable attorney's fee and costs. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424,
433-40 (1983); Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938, 956-59 (8th Cir. 2010).
Here is how and why the Court made its decision.
The Court awards most of Tanner's expenses, though not in the
way requested.
The filing fee and copies, a total of $990.94, are
recoverable as costs. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1920(1) & (4). The other things, a total
of $2,995.37, though unchallenged, are not recoverable as costs. But,
they are the kind of expenses routinely billed as out-of-pocket expenses
and will be awarded as part of a reasonable fee. Hernandez v. Bridgestone
Americas Tire Operations, LLC, 831 F.3d 940, 949 (8th Cir. 2016).
As the parties recognize, Tanner's success on the merits of his
many claims was limited. Early on, there was much pleading and
repleading. This diffuse approach was not the most efficient one. Two
of Tanner's thirteen federal claims (and echoing state claims) went to
trial. The Court's initial perception was that the First Amendment
issues were the core of the case. Doc. 60. But Tanner did little discovery
on them; they did not come into clear focus until trial; and the proof
necessitated extensive post-trial briefing. All this ended up taking
more time than it should have. Tanner prevailed on his tried claims.
He received nominal damages, a declaration that the State Police's
Facebook administration had violated the Constitution, and an
injunction requiring a fix.
The last two things are significant
achievements. The Court notes, and has considered, counsel's posttrial work, the later-recorded lawyer/ client electronic communication,
and counsel's efforts on this motion.
The Court appreciates counsel's reductions, but a deeper cut is
necessary. One hundred fifty hours is a reasonable number of hours
worked for the results achieved. Counsel's requested rate is too high
in the Court's experience for this kind of work in the Eastern District of
Arkansas by a lawyer with his level of experience. $200 an hour is a
reasonable rate. The math is $200/hour x 150 hours= $30,000. On top
of that, the Court adds as part of a reasonable fee the $2,995.37 in outof-pocket expenses that don't qualify as costs.
-2-
The Court awards Tanner $32,995.37 for attorney's fees, plus
$990.94 in costs, for a total of $33.986.31.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?