Lucero v. Edwards et al
ORDER Adopting 7 Recommended Disposition in all respects. Mr. Lucero's claims are dismissed, without prejudice. The Court certifies that this dismissal constitutes a "strike" for purposes for 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/9/2018. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PATRICK LOREN LUCERO
CASE NO. 4:18-CV-80-JM-BD
CLAYTON EDWARDS, et al.
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful
consideration of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation
should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Mr. Lucero’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Court certifies that
this dismissal constitutes a “strike” for purposes for 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that an in
forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of March, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?