Lucero v. Edwards et al

Filing 9

ORDER Adopting 7 Recommended Disposition in all respects. Mr. Lucero's claims are dismissed, without prejudice. The Court certifies that this dismissal constitutes a "strike" for purposes for 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/9/2018. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
PATRICK LOREN LUCERO
V.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-80-JM-BD

CLAYTON EDWARDS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful
consideration of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation
should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Mr. Lucero’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Court certifies that
this dismissal constitutes a “strike” for purposes for 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that an in
forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of March, 2018.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE