Randle v. Musiddig et al
Filing
58
ORDER approving and adopting 54 Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. Randle's due process claim, sexual harassment claim, false disciplinary claim, access to courts claim, loss of property claim, and his claim that an unknown substance was placed in his drink; dismissing, without prejudice, his claims against Defendants Nelson, Musiddiq, Williams, Connors, Williams, and Donahue based on their positions as either disciplinary or classification board members; and instructing the Clerk to terminate Defendants Austin, Gibson, Briggs, Mathis, Simmons, Thomas, Funk, Kellyward, Brawley, Brooks, Reed, Williams, Raft, Conner, Williams and Donahue as party Defendants. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/30/2018. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
LEODIS RANDLE
VS.
PLAINTIFF
4:18-CV-188-BRW-BD
D. MUSIDDIQ, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
I have received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Randle’s timely
objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Recommendation
in all respects.
Mr. Randle’s due process claim, sexual harassment claim, false disciplinary claim, access
to courts claim, loss of property claim, and his claim that an unknown substance was placed in
his drink are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Furthermore, his claims against Defendants
Nelson, Musiddiq, Williams, Connors, Williams, and Donahue based on their positions as either
disciplinary or classification board members are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk is
instructed to terminate Defendants Austin, Gibson, Briggs, Mathis, Simmons, Thomas, Funk,
Kellyward, Brawley, Brooks, Reed, Williams, Raft, Conner, Williams and Donahue as party
Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of May, 2018.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson_____________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?