Tippy v. Datapath
Filing
22
ORDER granting 17 motion to dismiss and dismissing Ms. Tippy's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/16/2020. (jbh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
SHERESE TIPPY
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:18-cv-00536-KGB
DATAPATH
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Plaintiff Sherese Tippy commenced the pending lawsuit on August 17, 2018 (Dkt. No. 2).
Ms. Tippy alleges that she suffered employment discrimination from defendant Datapath due to
her race and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e, et seq. (Id.). Before the Court is Ms. Tippy’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17). Datapath
has filed a response, and it has no objection to Ms. Tippy’s request to dismiss this action (Dkt. No.
18). The Court made Ms. Tippy aware of the practical effect of a voluntary dismissal, and directed
her to respond by September 30, 2020, to indicate whether she: (1) would like to withdraw the
pending motion to dismiss and proceed with this action; or (2) wishes to proceed with the requested
dismissal (Dkt. No. 20). Ms. Tippy responded that she would like to proceed with the requested
dismissal (Dkt. No. 21). Accordingly, the Court grants Ms. Tippy’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No.
17), and Ms. Tippy’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2).
It is so ordered this 16th day of October, 2020.
________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?