Tippy v. Datapath

Filing 22

ORDER granting 17 motion to dismiss and dismissing Ms. Tippy's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/16/2020. (jbh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION SHERESE TIPPY v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:18-cv-00536-KGB DATAPATH DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff Sherese Tippy commenced the pending lawsuit on August 17, 2018 (Dkt. No. 2). Ms. Tippy alleges that she suffered employment discrimination from defendant Datapath due to her race and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Id.). Before the Court is Ms. Tippy’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17). Datapath has filed a response, and it has no objection to Ms. Tippy’s request to dismiss this action (Dkt. No. 18). The Court made Ms. Tippy aware of the practical effect of a voluntary dismissal, and directed her to respond by September 30, 2020, to indicate whether she: (1) would like to withdraw the pending motion to dismiss and proceed with this action; or (2) wishes to proceed with the requested dismissal (Dkt. No. 20). Ms. Tippy responded that she would like to proceed with the requested dismissal (Dkt. No. 21). Accordingly, the Court grants Ms. Tippy’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17), and Ms. Tippy’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). It is so ordered this 16th day of October, 2020. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge    

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?