Stompingbear v. Robinson

Filing 52

ORDER granting 49 Motion for Copies; directing the Clerk of the Court to send Happy Stompingbear copies of Docket Nos. [45-1], 47 , and 48 and a copy of the docket sheet; denying, as moot, 50 Happy Stompingbear's motion for extension of time; and granting in part and denying in part 51 Happy Stompingbear's motion for copies and reconsideration and address change. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/2023. (llg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
HAPPY STOMPINGBEAR
ADC #651503
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No: 4:18-cv-00822 KGB

HAZEL ROBINSON

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff Happy Stompingbear’s motion for copies (Dkt. No. 49).
Happy Stompingbear states that Happy Stompingbear has not heard anything about this case since
Docket No. 44 (Id.). Happy Stompingbear requests a copy of everything that has been filed after
Docket No. 44 (Id.). For good cause shown, the motion is granted (Id.). The Clerk of the Court
is directed to send Happy Stompingbear copies of Docket Nos. 45-1, 47, and 48 and a copy of the
docket sheet.
Also before the Court is Happy Stompingbear’s notice of change of address and time
extension (Dkt. No. 50).

Happy Stompingbear states that Happy Stompingbear has been

transferred to a different unit and requests an extension of time to object to “whatever it is that I
still have not seen yet.” (Id.). The Court dismissed Happy Stompingbear’s claims against Hazel
Robinson in an Opinion and Order dated March 29, 2022, and the Court entered a Judgment the
same day. The Court has not entered an Order that requires a response from Happy Stompingbear.
Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Happy Stompingbear’s motion for extension of time (Id.).
Finally, before the Court is Happy Stompingbear’s motion for copies and reconsideration
and address change (Dkt. No. 51). Happy Stompingbear again states that he is missing Docket
Nos. 45-48 and that somewhere this case was closed (Id.). As set forth above, the Court grants
Happy Stompingbear’s motion for copies. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Happy

Stompingbear copies of Docket Nos. 45-1, 47, and 48 and a copy of the docket sheet. Additionally,
Happy Stompingbear’s motion for address change is granted. The Clerk of the Court has updated
Happy Stompingbear’s address with the Court. Happy Stompingbear asserts that the “magistrate
made a recommendation,” that Happy Stompingbear did not receive a copy of the
recommendation, and that Happy Stompingbear did not have an opportunity to “object before the
judge ma[de] a ruling” on the recommendation (Id.). Happy Stompingbear asserts that he is asking
the Court for due process (Id.). As the docket sheet indicates, the Court granted defendant Hazel
Robinson’s motion for summary judgment without a recommendation from United States
Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 45).

The Court did not rule on Happy

Stompingbear’s motion for summary judgment until after Happy Stompingbear had an opportunity
to respond to the motion and present material facts as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure (see Dkt. Nos. 43; 44; 45). The Court denies Happy Stompingbear’s motion for
reconsideration.

For these reasons, the Court grants, in part, and denies, in part, Happy

Stompingbear’s motion for copies and reconsideration and address change (Dkt. No. 51).
So ordered this 17th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge

2