Jager Pro LLC v. Bull Creek Welding and Fabrication Inc

Filing 68

ORDER: Joint status report 57 appreciated. 65 Motion denied as moot. 66 Motion conditionally granted. Jager may file the identified exhibits under seal for now. But, the parties' designation of documents as confidential does not answer the question of whether the documents should be kept sealed. Jager Pro must file a sealed brief showing - document by document - why redaction is impracticable and sealing is justified by 11/13/2020. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/15/2020. (jak)

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
PLAINTIFF

JAGER PRO, LLC
No. 4:19-cv-107-DPM

v.

BULL CREEK WELDING AND
FABRICATION, INC.

DEFENDANT

ORDER

Joint status report, Doc. 57, appreciated. Motion, Doc. 65, denied
as moot. Unopposed amended motion, Doc. 66, conditionally granted.
Jager may file the identified exhibits under seal for now. But, the
parties' designation of documents as confidential does not answer the
question of whether the documents should be kept sealed. See this
Court's Order in Panhandle Oil and Gas, Inc. v. BHP Billiton Petroleum
(Fayetteville) LLC, Doc. 36 in E.D. Ark. No. 4:17-cv-379-DPM (1

November 2017).

Jager Pro must file a sealed brief showing-

document by document- why redaction is impracticable and sealing is
justified. Brief due by 13 November 2020. The Court will evaluate the
sealing issue, and make a final decision, after receiving that explanation
and reviewing the documents.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge

-2-