Jackson v. Does

Filing 3

ORDER dismissing this case; and denying #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/7/2019. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DIVISION OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
WARREN JACKSON
v.

PLAINTIFF
4:19-cv-00696-BRW

DOES, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Plaintiff is suing “family/police, all of them” because they get government checks and
don’t want to see [him] do better”; have prevented him from getting his CDL; and have taken
things out of his car.1 Plaintiff also asserts: “I believe in God and go to church.”2
A district court has the authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to state a claim.3
Because Plaintiff’s Complaint is nonsensical and states no cause of action against Defendants for
which relief may be granted, this case is DISMISSED. The motion to proceed in forma
pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of October, 2019.

Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Doc. No. 2.

2

Id.

3

See Smith v. Boyd, 945 F.2d 1041 (8th Cir. 1991).
1