Jackson v. Does

Filing 3

ORDER dismissing this case; and denying 1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/7/2019. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION WARREN JACKSON v. PLAINTIFF 4:19-cv-00696-BRW DOES, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff is suing “family/police, all of them” because they get government checks and don’t want to see [him] do better”; have prevented him from getting his CDL; and have taken things out of his car.1 Plaintiff also asserts: “I believe in God and go to church.”2 A district court has the authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to state a claim.3 Because Plaintiff’s Complaint is nonsensical and states no cause of action against Defendants for which relief may be granted, this case is DISMISSED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of October, 2019. Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. No. 2. 2 Id. 3 See Smith v. Boyd, 945 F.2d 1041 (8th Cir. 1991). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?