Mallory v. Bland et al

Filing 49

ORDER approving and adopting 40 Recommendation as this Court's findings in its entirety; granting 34 Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. Mallory's claims regarding his medical care pr ovided by the Defendants between 01/27/2018 and 07/04/2019, based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and dismissing, without prejudice, claims regarding Defendant Bland's failure to refer Mr. Mallory to an outside provider at his 07/05/2019 encounter with her and his claim that the Defendant failed to renew his ibuprofen prescription, based on a failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 09/08/2020. (ajt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MARLON MALLORY, ADC #142660 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:20-CV-105-JM-BD ESTELLA BLAND, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received a Recommendation for dismissal of some of Mr. Mallory’s claims. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the file, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in its entirety. The Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED. Mr. Mallory’s claims regarding his medical care provided by the Defendants between January 27, 2018 and July 4, 2019 are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. In addition, claims regarding Defendant Bland’s failure to refer Mr. Mallory to an outside provider at his July 5, 2019 encounter with her and his claim that the Defendants failed to renew his ibuprofen prescription are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on a failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of September, 2020. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?