Raper v. Deen et al

Filing 14

ORDER approving and adopting #6 proposed findings and recommendations as this Court's findings and recommendations in all respects in their entirety; and certifying that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith, because the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/28/2021. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JAMES M. RAPER, JR. v. PETITIONER Case No. 4:21-CV-166 BRW-JTK THOMAS DEEN, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY DRUG TASK FORCE FOR 10TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT RESPONDENTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After careful review of the findings and recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). Because the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability, it certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2021. Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?