Calvin v. Randall et al

Filing 99

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 96 recent jury verdict as well as prior Orders in this case: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on the assault claims, the Fourth-Amendment-related claims, the negligence-based claims (including but not limited to things like failure to train and failure to supervise), the outrage claims, and the invasion of privacy claims; (2) the Fourteenth-Amendment-related and ACRA-related claims against Defendant John Randall are dismissed with prejudice under the doctrine of qualified immunity; and (3) all other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 9/25/2024. (ldb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
GERRY CALVIN
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:21-cv-00224-LPR

JOHN RANDALL, individually and in his
official capacity, et al.

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the recent jury verdict as well as prior Orders in this case, it is CONSIDERED,
ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on the assault
claims, the Fourth-Amendment-related claims, the negligence-based claims (including but not
limited to things like failure to train and failure to supervise), the outrage claims, and the invasion
of privacy claims; (2) the Fourteenth-Amendment-related and ACRA-related claims against
Defendant John Randall are dismissed with prejudice under the doctrine of qualified immunity;
and (3) all other claims are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ADJUDGED this 25th day of September 2024.

________________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE