Scott v. Houston et al

Filing 6

ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/2023. (jbh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SCOTT v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:21-cv-00661-KGB BRENT HOUSTON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Christopher Scott, an inmate at the Saline County Detention Center, filed a pro se complaint on July 22, 2021 (Dkt. No. 1). On October 8, 2021, the Court denied as incomplete Mr. Scott’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 4). The Court directed Mr. Scott either to: (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full; or (2) file a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days, or by Monday, November 8, 2021 (Id.). Mr. Scott was advised that, if he failed to do so timely, this case would be dismissed without prejudice. Local Rule 5.5.(c)(2) of the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas (“If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice.”). A copy of the Court’s October 8, 2021 Order was mailed to Mr. Scott at his address of record. As of the date of this Order, Mr. Scott has not complied with the Court’s Order of October 8, 2021, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this 17th of January, 2023. ___________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?