Adcock v. Saint Jean Industries Inc

Filing 31

ORDER: The Court appreciates Adcock's response to Saint Jean's motion to seal, 26 , and has reviewed the conditionally sealed documents, 30 . The Court directs Saint Jean to file redacted versions of exhibit 6 and the attachment to exhibit 7 on the public docket by 12/16/2022. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/17/2022. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
STEPHANIE L. ADCOCK

PLAINTIFF

No. 4:21-cv-669-DPM

v.

SAINT JEAN INDUSTRIES, INC.

DEFENDANT

ORDER

The Court appreciates Adcock's response to Saint Jean's motion
to seal, Doc. 26, and has reviewed the conditionally sealed documents,

Doc. 30. While the need to protect employee privacy is undeniably
important, Saint Jean can do this through redactions instead of through
filings under seal. Names, job titles, contact information, photographs,
locations, dates, and all other identifying information can be redacted
so that the employees are not identifiable. The Court directs Saint Jean
to file redacted versions of exhibit 6 and the attachment to exhibit 7 on
the public docket by 16 December 2022.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge