Martin v. Doe
ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing, without prejudice 2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/2023. (ldb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ESKER MARTIN, III
Case No. 4:21-cv-00693-KGB-JJV
The Court has reviewed Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 7). Plaintiff Esker Martin, III has not filed any
objections, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Id.).
The Court dismisses Mr. Martin’s complaint without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). The Court
also certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
It is so ordered this 17th day of January, 2023.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?