Martin v. Doe

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing, without prejudice 2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/2023. (ldb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
ESKER MARTIN, III
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:21-cv-00693-KGB-JJV

DOE

DEFENDANT
ORDER
The Court has reviewed Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United

States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 7). Plaintiff Esker Martin, III has not filed any
objections, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Id.).
The Court dismisses Mr. Martin’s complaint without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). The Court
also certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
It is so ordered this 17th day of January, 2023.

Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge