Pusha v. Arkansas, State of

Filing 3

Order adopting and approving in all respects in their entirety 2 proposed findings and recommendations. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Because the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability, it certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/18/2021. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MICHAEL PUSHA v. PETITIONER CASE NO. 4:21-cv-00964-JM ARKANSAS, STATE OF RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After careful review of the findings and recommendations, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). Because the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability, it certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2021. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?