Barker v. Payne

Filing 41

ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's motion; granting in part and denying in part 37 , 39 , and 40 Plaintiff's motions for copies; directing the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a copy of docket entries 32 , 33 , and 36 ; and denying 38 Plaintiff's motion for judicial notice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/17/2022. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MARK A. BARKER ADC #139988 V. PLAINTIFF 4:22CV00006 JM DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction DEFENDANT ORDER Pending are several motions filed by the Plaintiff in this closed case. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff=s motion for reconsideration, objections, and the entire record de novo. Plaintiff has failed to present any information, evidence or new legal authority which would require the Court to reconsider the Order adopting the Magistrate’s findings and recommendation. Therefore, the motion is denied. Plaintiff moves the Court for copies of his motion for reconsideration, brief in support of habeas corpus and objections, as well as the envelopes which contained his brief in support of habeas corpus, and his objections. The motions for a copy of his motion for reconsideration, brief, and objections are granted. The motion for copies of envelopes is denied. Plaintiff asks the Court to order prison employees to do his legal typing and/or grant him a hearing because he believes there is a conspiracy by the prison administration against him. The Court does not have the power to order prison personnel to do Plaintiff’s legal typing. It should be noted that the Court is able to adequately read and understand Plaintiff’s handwriting. Further, there is no evidence that the prison administration is conspiring to harm Plaintiff. Therefore, a hearing is not necessary. In conclusion, Plaintiff=s motion (ECF No. 36) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motions for copies (ECF Nos. 37, 39, 40) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of docket entries 32, 33, and 36. Plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice (ECF No. 38) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2022. ______________________________ James M. Moody Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?