Bush v. Clark et al

Filing 11

ORDER declining to adopt 7 Recommended Disposition; dismissing 1 complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/2023. (jbh)

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-00511-KGB Document 11 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION STANLEY LAMONT BUSH v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:22-cv-00511-KGB-JTR CLARK, Sergeant, Pulaski County Detention Facility, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER When plaintiff Stanley Lamont Bush filed this lawsuit, he was incarcerated at the Pulaski County Detention Facility (“PCDF”) (Dkt. No. 4). On November 8, 2022, mail to Mr. Bush at the PCDF was returned undeliverable (Dkt. No. 8). As a result, on November 18, 2022, the Court entered a show cause Order to require Mr. Bush to inform the Court of his current contact information within 30 days of the entry of the show cause Order (Dkt. No. 9). The Court notified Mr. Bush that failure to provide the Court with a valid mailing address within 30 days may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute (Id.). See Local Rule 5.5 of the United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. As of the date of this Order, Mr. Bush has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s November 18, 2022, Order, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, Mr. Bush’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute (Dkt. No. 1). The Court declines to adopt the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 7). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 17th day of January, 2023. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?