Phillips v. Does

Filing 7

ORDER declining to adopt 4 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; and remanding the case to Magistrate Kearney for further recommendations. The Court is going to accept the late filing but gives Mr. Philips notice that all deadlines must be strictly followed going forward. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 09/16/2022. (llg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
ANTIONA PHILLIPS
ADC # 162493
v.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO: 4:22-cv-00643-JM-JTK

DOES

DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted

by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. While he did not file objections, Mr.
Phillips did file an amended counterclaim as ordered by Judge Kearney (Doc. No. 3), albeit a week
out of time. The Court is going to accept the late filing but gives Mr. Philips notice that all
deadlines must be strictly followed going forward. Therefore, Court is going to decline to adopt
the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and remand the case to Magistrate Kearney
for further recommendations.
DATED this 16th day of September, 2022.

____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE