Carroll v. Higgins et al
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. Carroll's claims due to a lack of prosecution. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/17/2022. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HIGGINS, et al.
Paul Criswell, an inmate at the Pulaski County Detention Facility (“Detention Facility”),
filed this lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of himself and 45 other inmates,
including Plaintiff Bryan Carroll. Doc. 1. Pursuant to Court policy, the Court opened 46 different
lawsuits, including this one for Mr. Carroll.
On October 7, 2022, mail from the Court to Mr. Carroll was returned as “undeliverable.”
On October 11, 2022, the Court ordered Mr. Carroll to notify the Court of his current
address within 30 days or risk dismissal of his complaint. Doc. 4. To date, he has not responded to
the Court’s October 11 Order, and the time to do so has passed.
Mr. Carroll’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice due to a lack of prosecution. FED.
R. CIV. P. 41(b); Local rule 5.5(c)(2). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be
taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2022.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?