Shell v. Lingo et al

Filing 2

TRANSFER ORDER directing that this case is immediately transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/21/2022. (kdr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT DALE SHELL V. PLAINTIFF No. 4:22-CV-01121-BRW-JTR JOSH LINGO, Captain, Hot Spring County Detention Center; et al. DEFENDANTS TRANSFER ORDER Plaintiff Robert Dale Shell (“Shell”), a prisoner in the Hot Spring County Detention Center (“HSCDC”), has filed a pro se § 1983 Complaint alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement and inadequate medical care during his time incarcerated in the HSCDC. Doc. 1. Shell also makes allegations against the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office The federal venue statute provides that, in a case that is not based on diversity jurisdiction, venue is proper in the judicial district where “any defendant resides” or “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). According to Shell’s Complaint, the events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in Hot Spring County and Montgomery County, which are both located in the Western District of Arkansas. Accordingly, the interest of justice will best be served by transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (“For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this case is IMMEDIATELY TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. DATED this 21st day of November, 2022. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?